Dorhyan — AIF due diligence, structuring & EU passporting
Home
Back to blog

Does AIFMD Apply to US and UK Fund Managers?

Short answer: yes — whenever you market a fund into the European Union. The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) is not limited to EU-domiciled GPs. The moment a US or UK manager actively approaches an EU professional investor, the directive applies, even when the fund itself sits in Delaware, the Cayman Islands or the BVI.

The longer answer is what most managers underestimate: how AIFMD applies depends on three regimes that are constantly conflated — the National Private Placement Regime (NPPR), reverse solicitation, and the third-country regime. This guide breaks down what each one means in practice and where the line really is.

1. When AIFMD Bites for Non-EU Managers

AIFMD captures any non-EU AIFM that:

  • Markets an alternative investment fund to EU professional investors, or
  • Manages an EU-domiciled AIF (Luxembourg, Ireland, France, etc.).

“Marketing” has a wide statutory definition: a direct or indirect offering or placement, at the initiative of the AIFM, of units in an AIF to investors domiciled in the EU. A pitch deck sent to a Paris-based family office is marketing. A teaser handed out at a Frankfurt conference is marketing. A “quick intro call” at the request of your placement agent is marketing.

“If the EU investor did not unambiguously initiate the conversation, you are marketing — and AIFMD applies.”

2. The National Private Placement Regime (NPPR)

NPPR is the workhorse for US and UK managers today. It is the country-by-country mechanism that allows a non-EU AIFM to market a non-EU AIF (or an EU AIF) to professional investors in a specific member state, subject to that state's rules under Article 42 of AIFMD.

Three baseline conditions apply in every country:

  1. 1.Compliance with AIFMD's transparency obligations (Articles 22, 23 and 24) — annual report, pre-investment disclosures and Annex IV regulatory reporting to the host NCA.
  2. 2.Appropriate cooperation arrangements (MoUs) between the AIFM's home regulator, the AIF's regulator and the host EU regulator.
  3. 3.The AIFM's home jurisdiction must not be on the FATF high-risk list.

On top of those baselines, member states layer their own requirements. The result is a patchwork:

  • Germany (BaFin) — full notification with depositary-lite, audited financials and German-language documentation.
  • France (AMF) — historically one of the most restrictive NPPRs; a separate “sub-threshold” regime exists for managers under €100m / €500m AUM.
  • Netherlands (AFM) — designation regime, fast in practice but with strict marketing-material rules.
  • Nordics (Sweden, Finland, Denmark) — relatively pragmatic notification process, often used as a first NPPR test bed.
  • Italy, Spain, Belgium — workable but slower; expect 6–12 weeks for clearance.

Ireland and Luxembourg do not have a meaningful NPPR for foreign managers in practice. To distribute there you typically need a local AIFM or a third-party ManCo solution.

3. Reverse Solicitation: What It Actually Allows

Reverse solicitation — sometimes called “passive marketing” — is the narrow exemption that lets a non-EU manager accept a subscription from an EU investor without triggering AIFMD, provided the investor truly initiated the contact on their own initiative.

It is also the most misused concept in the industry. ESMA's 2020 guidance and the subsequent CSA exercise made the position clear:

  • Any prior promotion, advertising, capital introduction event, teaser or website disclosure can disqualify a later subscription from reverse-solicitation status.
  • A pre-existing relationship is not, by itself, enough to make the inquiry ‘at the investor's initiative’.
  • The burden of proof sits with the manager. Regulators expect contemporaneous evidence — emails, attestations, audit trails.
“Reverse solicitation is a defence, not a distribution strategy. Build a business on it and you will lose investors and, eventually, your license to market in Europe.”

4. The Third-Country Regime and the AIFMD Passport

AIFMD originally envisaged extending the EU marketing passport to non-EU AIFMs (the “third-country passport”). ESMA gave a positive opinion for several jurisdictions, including the United States and the United Kingdom, back in 2016. The European Commission never activated it.

With AIFMD II (Directive EU 2024/927) entering into application on 16 April 2026, the political mood has shifted. NPPR survives, but member states are tightening substance, delegation and reporting requirements applied to non-EU managers. The practical implication for US and UK GPs is straightforward:

  • The cost of running pure NPPR distribution into multiple member states will keep climbing.
  • Setting up an EU AIFM, or partnering with a regulated third-party ManCo in Luxembourg, France or Ireland, is becoming the default for managers raising more than €100–250m in Europe.
  • Reverse solicitation will be policed more aggressively, especially around AIFMD II's new marketing-communication rules.

5. What This Means in Practice for US Managers

  • A small first European raise (one or two cornerstone LPs in two countries) often runs cleanly under NPPR.
  • A pan-European raise across 4+ member states usually breaks even, or wins, against the cost of an EU structure or third-party AIFM.
  • If you are using a placement agent in Europe, their MiFID licence does not absolve you of AIFMD obligations. The directive applies to you, not just to them.

6. What This Means in Practice for UK Managers

Since Brexit, UK AIFMs are third-country managers for AIFMD purposes. The temporary permissions regime is gone for AIFs. Selling into the EU is now an NPPR exercise — country by country — exactly as it is for a US manager.

  • Many UK GPs now run a parallel Luxembourg or Irish AIF managed by a third-party ManCo, with the UK entity acting as delegated portfolio manager.
  • Annex IV reporting obligations apply to every EU jurisdiction you have notified — those returns add up quickly.
  • Reverse solicitation is even riskier post-Brexit, because regulators apply heightened scrutiny to UK-EU flows.

7. A Practical Decision Framework

  1. 1.Map your target LPs by domicile before choosing a regime — the geography drives the cost, not your fund's strategy.
  2. 2.Pressure-test reverse solicitation: if your fundraising plan depends on it in any country, you do not have a plan.
  3. 3.Compare NPPR cost per country (legal + regulator fees + ongoing Annex IV) against a third-party AIFM solution at 12-month, 24-month and 36-month horizons.
  4. 4.Pre-clear marketing materials per jurisdiction. BaFin, AMF and CSSF each interpret ‘marketing’ differently.
  5. 5.Document everything. With AIFMD II, your audit trail is your defence.

The Dorhyan View

AIFMD is not a barrier to entry for US and UK managers. It is a design constraint. The managers who scale successfully in Europe are the ones who choose their regime deliberately — NPPR, third-party AIFM, own AIFM — rather than drifting into reverse solicitation and hoping the regulator does not look.

At Dorhyan, we help non-EU GPs map this decision, secure the right structure, and stay compliant once capital starts flowing. That is the difference between marketing in Europe and being marketable in Europe.

Sources

  • Directive 2011/61/EU (AIFMD), Articles 36, 42 and 67–68 — third-country provisions
  • Directive (EU) 2024/927 (AIFMD II) — EUR-Lex
  • ESMA — Opinion on the application of the AIFMD passport to non-EU AIFMs and AIFs (2016)
  • ESMA — Public Statement on reverse solicitation in the context of the UK's withdrawal from the EU (13 January 2021)
  • ESMA — 2023 Common Supervisory Action on the supervision of cross-border activities of investment funds
Ready to discuss your European market access strategy? Book a call with the Dorhyan team.